| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [NET]: Fix deletion of local addresses only varying in prefix length |
| From: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:30:42 +0100 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E1D78DN-0002te-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050304012003.GA31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1D78DN-0002te-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
* Herbert Xu <E1D78DN-0002te-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-03-04 19:31 > Do we really need to handle this case? If we do then would it be better > to consider ifa_prefixlen only when there are multiple addresses present > which match but differ by prefix length? One argument that would speak for the original patch is that IPv6 already handles it this way so it would be more consistent. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] iproute2 updates, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] iproute2 updates, Stephen Hemminger |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] [NET]: Fix deletion of equal local IPv4 addresses only varying in prefix length, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/2] [NEIGH]: rtnetlink neighbour cleanups, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |