| To: | Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:41:19 -0800 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050303213911.GV3120@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <7.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> <8.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303130031.066f0862.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42277ED6.4020707@xxxxxxxxx> <20050303132906.2b5d597f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303213911.GV3120@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:39:11 -0800 Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The lock only happens if CONFIG_NETPOLL=y _and_ a netpoll client (eg > netconsole) is registered on the device in question. I actually missed that condition. This is less intrusive then. I'm actually ok with these changes therefore. I'll merge these patches in (with the SKB leak fix of course) and will push upstream once we work out how 2.6.x development is going to process :-) |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] (3/12) skge: remove unneeded include's, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Baruch Even |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, Matt Mackall |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, Matt Mackall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |