| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:33:41 -0500 |
| Cc: | mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050303132906.2b5d597f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <7.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> <8.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20050303130031.066f0862.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42277ED6.4020707@xxxxxxxxx> <20050303132906.2b5d597f.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:29:06PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:17:10 -0500
> Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Heh, I was just writing this same message.
> >
> > On a related note... David, I would prefer if you merged up the netpoll
> > stuff, since it touches mainly net/*
> >
> > Is that cool w/ you?
>
> No problem. I still don't like this code in that it adds a locking
> penalty to everyone just by virtue of enabling netpoll. We've worked
> so hard with things like NETIF_F_LLTX to eliminate locking, so this
> would be a huge step backwards.
Agreed.
Jeff
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, Matt Mackall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |