| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping |
| From: | Baruch Even <baruch@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:26:58 +0000 |
| Cc: | Injong Rhee <rhee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, John Heffner <jheffner@xxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yee-Ting Li <Yee-Ting.Li@xxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050303123811.4d934249@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050303123811.4d934249@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) |
Stephen Hemminger wrote: Both BIC TCP 1.1 and TCP-H include patches to disable the queue throttling behaviour of netif_rx. The existing throttling algorithm causes all packets to be dumped (until queue emptys) when the packet backlog reaches netdev_max_backog. I suppose this is some kind of DoS prevention mechanism. The problem is that this dumping action creates mulitple packet loss that forces TCP back to slow start. But, all this is really moot for the case of any reasonably high speeddevice because of NAPI. netif_rx is not even used for any device that uses NAPI. The NAPI code path uses net_receive_skb and the receive queue management is doneby the receive scheduling (dev->quota) of the rx_scheduler. My question is why did BIC TCP and TCP-H turn off the throttling? Was it because they were/are using older 2.4 devices without NAPI. NAPI was not used because it caused skews in the performance, I haven't tested it myself, just passing hearsay. I have patches for the SACK processing to improve performance which should reduce the problems with the queues, but they are for 2.6.6 and forward porting them to 2.6.11 is quite a bit of work (too much was changed in conflicting areas). I hope to get to work on this soon. The bad effect of the queue throttling was mostly the killed ack clock and the fact that recovery was only when timeout happened. Preferably only the packets that don't fit should be dropped, but the queue emptying should not be waited for. Baruch |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |