| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [PATCH 6/7] netpoll: handle xmit_lock recursion similarly |
| From: | Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:46:32 -0600 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <6.454130102@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Handle possible recursion on xmit_lock while we're at it.
Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Index: rc4/net/core/netpoll.c
===================================================================
--- rc4.orig/net/core/netpoll.c 2005-02-17 22:40:05.000000000 -0600
+++ rc4/net/core/netpoll.c 2005-02-17 22:40:07.000000000 -0600
@@ -247,8 +247,9 @@
return;
}
- /* avoid ->poll recursion */
- if(np->poll_owner == __smp_processor_id()) {
+ /* avoid recursion */
+ if(np->poll_owner == __smp_processor_id() ||
+ np->dev->xmit_lock_owner == __smp_processor_id()) {
if (np->drop)
np->drop(skb);
else
|
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH 4/7] netpoll: fix ->poll() locking, Matt Mackall |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 5/7] netpoll: add optional dropping and queueing support, Matt Mackall |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 7/7] netpoll: avoid kfree_skb on packets with destructo, Matt Mackall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |