| To: | Quantum Scientific <Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:58:40 -0500 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200502271310.59682.Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200502270928.44402.Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200502271220.06560.Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42221897.4000704@xxxxxxxxx> <200502271310.59682.Info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040922 |
Quantum Scientific wrote: On Sunday 27 February 2005 12:59, Jeff Garzik wrote:Connection tracking doesn't scale. It's impossible to hash the entire Internet.I have read this. And I've seen inferences that IPV6 takes care of this problem somehow automatically. But no one seems to know how. The solution is to not use connection tracking.You don't want to break the end-to-end connection model that founded the Internet.
Jeff
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: A bug in the Kernel?, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted, Quantum Scientific |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted, Quantum Scientific |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted, Quantum Scientific |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |