| To: | Mark Fortescue <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linux-2.6.8.1 to linux-2.6.10: Kernel Patching Issues. |
| From: | Lee Revell <rlrevell@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:47:23 -0500 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10502251550520.26208-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.10.10502251550520.26208-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 16:40 +0000, Mark Fortescue wrote: > Hi all, > > I am not sure exactly where to send this email. A have chosen the > ip4/ip6 networking as the issues are in this area of the kernel. > > The kernel patch files patch-2.6.9 and patch-2.6.10 do not apear to be > correct. No, you're doing it wrong. 2.6.8.1 was a bugfix release. The correct patching order is 2.6.8 -> 2.6.9 -> 2.6.10. Lee |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Are there any explanation for struct flowi?, Park Lee |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | What's the purpose of ip_route_output_flow()?, Park Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | linux-2.6.8.1 to linux-2.6.10: Kernel Patching Issues., Mark Fortescue |
| Next by Thread: | Re: linux-2.6.8.1 to linux-2.6.10: Kernel Patching Issues., Tim Schmielau |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |