netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x r8169 update

To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [BK PATCHES] 2.6.x r8169 update
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:52:39 +0100
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx>, Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <421D141C.4030602@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <421D141C.4030602@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> :
[...]
> Agree it needs fixing, but I actually think the rx-offset stuff is more 
> urgent than this.  For the future, it would be useful for both of us to 
> have separate r8169-fixes and r8169-cleanups queues.

Do you have a synonym/pointer for the rx-offset stuff ?

It will help me to rework the flow if you can describe in a few words what
you expect wrt fixes/cleanups issue. Don't be shy, I won't use it as a
contract set in stone :o)

--
Ueimor

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>