netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Bug-hunting

from [David S. Miller] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug-hunting
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:53:46 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <421CDC73.9080006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <421B4AB7.9030003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050222104448.31373a99.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <421B8563.9030608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050222115114.0d0e568e.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <421BBE7B.1050009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050222193000.404ae6d2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <421C5AC8.70601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050223112927.349550d0.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <421CDC73.9080006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:41:39 +0100
Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_mem?
> 
> Its set to 98304   131072  196608
> I have changed this to 1024000 1025000 1026000
> 
> It didnt change anything. The send-buffer still keeps being shrinked down.

That's why I felt silly telling you again where the limit
is configured.

Please write the test program already.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Bug-hunting, Christian Schmid
Next by Date:  Re: Bug-hunting, John Heffner
Previous by Thread:  Re: Bug-hunting, Christian Schmid
Next by Thread:  Re: Bug-hunting, Christian Schmid
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]