[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Intel and TOE in the news

To: "'Rick Jones'" <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Intel and TOE in the news
From: "Leonid Grossman" <leonid.grossman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:30:21 -0800
In-reply-to: <421BA204.704@xxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcUZJEu7VEX5UZd5TYabcPLjEhMPogAAPYRA
No wait, "paste in" only packets that are already received when a traffic
interrupt comes...
At 10GbE, the entire window will likely be sitting there :-)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rick Jones
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 1:20 PM
> To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Intel and TOE in the news
> I always thought the biggest issue with "RSO" would be 
> deciding how long to wait for another segment to paste-in 
> with the rest?
> rick jones
> all the previous talk about header/data split makes me wax 
> nostalgic for the FDDI adaptors of the late 80's and early 
> 90's that did that - back when MTU's were >= page size and 
> life was good :) :) :)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>