| To: | Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: argh more bugs!!! |
| From: | Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:37:46 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050222002315.GE26248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <421A3EB8.4050607@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050221202854.GA26248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <421A45CA.80001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050221205606.GB26248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <421A4FFA.7090003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050221213610.GC26248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <421A68D5.6020808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050222002315.GE26248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817 |
OK the problem with the break is solved. I am REALLY sorry but it was not the net-code in linux. The
SQL-Server has experienced an index-key collision as I added a second multi-key to it. It seems the
sort-buffer overflowed and it suddenly raised the cpu-time very high. I will contact
mysql-developers and ask them about it. The break was due to the table-lock mysql does for every update.
The problem with the slowdown at many sockets still exists. This isnt solved yet. I hope this isnt my fault as well. Else I feel forced to spend 1000 dollars to some open-source foundation. *grin* Francois Romieu wrote: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :It suddenly appeared again. there you go..........Thanks. I'll do some graphics tomorrow to be sure but the slabs do not seem wrong. vmstat output looks weird: procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu---- r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa 2 3 0 8496 25236 7941848 0 0 37920 0 7563 2788 13 19 34 33 2 2 0 9268 25172 7941300 0 0 36688 0 7424 2814 15 19 40 26 1 0 0 19576 25264 7928356 0 0 9468 13080 8072 607 22 13 59 6 1 0 0 18052 25264 7928356 0 0 0 0 7975 40 18 7 75 0 1 0 0 17660 25264 7928356 0 0 0 0 7487 38 21 4 75 0 1 0 0 18560 25264 7928356 0 0 0 0 6500 44 22 3 75 0 1 0 0 20072 25264 7928356 0 0 0 0 5834 44 23 2 75 0 1 3 0 21516 25320 7928300 0 0 0 3408 6796 153 24 3 58 15 0 4 0 10596 25436 7942056 0 0 44084 2220 11226 4282 12 10 31 47 2 2 0 9324 25240 7943952 0 0 39292 0 8433 3212 9 13 39 38 4 1 0 11596 25300 7941580 0 0 35820 0 7945 4306 17 21 30 32 0 5 0 13208 25560 7939280 0 0 40684 6456 7920 4081 19 18 32 31 4 1 0 12620 24944 7859724 0 0 32204 272 7306 2304 12 28 27 34 1 3 0 64964 24852 7888240 0 0 44944 96 7314 2631 19 31 24 27 ??? Since you have a lot of cpu, could you "strace -f -T -o /tmp/nitz -p xyz" one or two of your perl processes when they hang ? If you do not have too many processes, monitoring "echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger" for some time could tell what the system is waiting for. -- Ueimor |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 2.6.11-rc4-netdev1 0/5] r8169: intro, Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Intel and TOE in the news, Alex Aizman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: argh more bugs!!!, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!!, Christian Schmid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |