| To: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few |
| From: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:25:41 +0100 |
| Cc: | Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050221120223.GA30348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Mail-followup-to: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| References: | <421925DB.2060602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <42192AAF.8020609@xxxxxxxxxx> <42192CD5.5090401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050221090121.GA7478@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4219B99E.1000603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050221120223.GA30348@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 01:02:23PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > O_NONBLOCK send() is really nonblocking, but O_NONBLOCK sendfile() It is? So it returns EAGAIN if the data to be sent is not in the page cache? -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |