| To: | Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] eepro100: remove ID for 82556 |
| From: | John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:18:25 -0800 |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=fuGPP718Cz/DANK8fwKDLBRXxzWd+WstBu95frCE79PtvFJmZ94M42icawEM+S/Wqn7xVCjkUHMHmJjZwqCCBtaknmrWcI789pVhxQFlVp3u765EGf7NVf0e5qIrRfjSAbrmK6KBiaOfq6mDpdvsgepS69ABGM28RDW2/60J64A= |
| In-reply-to: | <E1D2Pek-0007RZ-Tk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4216C8A3.4020303@xxxxxxxxx> <E1D2Pek-0007RZ-Tk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
The 82556 is not support by the e100 driver. It is a different architecture than the one started with the 82557 thru the current generation of PRO/100 controllers. On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 10:08:02 +0200, Meelis Roos <mroos@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > JG> I see the thread, but I still worry about removing the id in your patch, > JG> since the poster in the thread says that they had to -add- an ID to both > JG> e100 and eepro100 in order to perform their test. > JG> > JG> Has anyone with this PCI ID actually confirmed that eepro100 does not > JG> work for them? > > I added the PCI ID only to e100, it was already present in eepro100. > > Neither unmodified eepro100 nor pci-id-added e100 worked with this > chip so IMHO it's safe to remove this PCI ID from eepro100 too. > > -- > Meelis Roos > > -- Cheers, John |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] r8169: code clean-up, Jon Mason |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IPsec xfrm resolution, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] eepro100: remove ID for 82556, Meelis Roos |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] e1000, errata 2{3,4} - possible EEH or memory corruption when DMA crosses a 64k boundary, Olaf Hering |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |