[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage

To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pktgen: reduce stack usage
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:11:21 +0100
Cc: robert.olsson@xxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20050218134219.3f079110.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
References: <20050218134219.3f079110.rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx> :
> (resend)
> Any comments this time?

Did I miss a simultaneous use of both buffers or could it be possible to
save an extra IP_NAME_SZ bytes of data with an evil ugly union ?

Btw, does anyone intend to fix the use of sleepable functions in 
proc_thread_write() with spinlock ("thread_lock") held or should
I allocate it some cycles ?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>