| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch] wireless-2.6 stuff |
| From: | Matthew J Galgoci <mgalgoci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:42:45 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050214070403.GA32480@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502140056290.4356@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050214070403.GA32480@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > -comment "Obsolete Wireless cards support (pre-802.11)" > > - depends on NET_RADIO && (INET || ISA || PCMCIA) > > +comment "Obsolete Wireless cards support (pre-802.11) (OBSOLETE)" > > + depends on NET_RADIO && (INET || ISA || PCMCIA) && OBSOLETE > > bad idea. we have tons of totally outdated hardware that's not marked > obsolete. On the grounds that these non-standard radios weren't horribly prolific and were pre-802.11, I think that they should be marked as obsolete and depend on obsolete. Does _anyone_ here have any of these radios? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: IP More Fragements bit problem., Vincent Roqueta |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] VLAN over bonding, Olaf Kirch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] wireless-2.6 stuff, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch] wireless-2.6 stuff, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |