netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch

from [Andi Kleen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch
From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
Date: 12 Feb 2005 22:30:30 +0100
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:30:30 +0100
Cc: hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx, rick.jones2@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050212112307.00fefaa2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <0525M9211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050211150420.74737b2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050211170740.2608419b.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <m1fz02f05c.fsf@xxxxxx> <20050212112307.00fefaa2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i 
> We're testing the new code that sets PSH on every TSO frame.
> If we disable TSO, the new code won't be exercised nor tested.
> :-)

Sorry, I read the thread out of order (shouldn't do that) Ignore my mail.

-Andi
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Nivedita Singhvi
Next by Date:  Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] netlink check sender, audit, Pablo Neira
Previous by Thread:  Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Alexey Kuznetsov
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]