| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch |
| From: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:52:46 +0300 |
| Cc: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rick.jones2@xxxxxx, hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ms2.inr.ac.ru; b=nf0SqowzKX0fDjzBXurgrksczTwWtyxDBvACQxOAKemNamrhSVsWWjogicvmFwzROSREIWJI32TspBHTpFwhyskuuYMWy1E8iPJKTuB//8UwM5NqQyarTKjVl6q5aemSpAz+1FutjZVYJ8+MpgjpgGwimXUSQDpAx6wCsKPu3fQ=; |
| In-reply-to: | <20050212112811.13a0b97d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <0525M9211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420D37A3.6020209@xxxxxx> <20050211170958.17fcde21.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050212143105.GB27456@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050212112811.13a0b97d.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6i |
Hello! > It is correct. Although, I am still believing that setting PSH > is the avenue of investigation. Exactly. That's why the next test should be with disabled TSO in 2.6.9. If too rare PSHs were a problem, it will show as the same disaster there. [ And, to be honest, in this case, I daresay MacOS X may be left with its bugs alone. Or we could help it with something like setting PSH when we are in slow start and each half of CWND after completion of slow start. Or just set PSH on each frame. ] Alexey |
| Previous by Date: | RE: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Leonid Grossman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Leonid Grossman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |