| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch |
| From: | Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:11:43 +0100 |
| Cc: | hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, niv@xxxxxxxxxx, rick.jones2@xxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050211170740.2608419b.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (David S. Miller's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:07:40 -0800") |
| References: | <0525M9211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050211150420.74737b2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050211170740.2608419b.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > I guess this is e1000. Any e1000 internals experts reading > here who can comment on how e1000's TSO engine treats the > PSH flag? If that is the problem it should be easy to test for. Just disable TSO with ethtool -K ethX tso off Hubert, does that make the problem go away? -Andi |
| Previous by Date: | [RFC][PATCH 3/3] netlink check sender, rtnetlink, Chris Wright |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ipt_ROUTE and destination MAC address, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |