| To: | Tim Mattox <tmattox@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3 5/5] bonding: Update/rewrite bonding.txt |
| From: | Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:13:37 -0800 |
| Cc: | bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Tim Mattox <tmattox@xxxxxxxxx> of "Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:49:44 EST." <ea86ce2205021104496401b980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Tim Mattox <tmattox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
>Are you going to add some text about the original
>use of bonding in balanced-rr mode with isolated
>switches that we had discussed at the end of Jan.?
>This method is still used in Beowulf clusters for
>high performance as apposed to high availability.
Yep. I haven't forgotten about it, just haven't written it up
yet. I've got a couple of other things to add as well, but all of that
can be done as patches later.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fubar@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | IP More Fragements bit problem., Vincent Roqueta |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: IP More Fragements bit problem., Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc3 5/5] bonding: Update/rewrite bonding.txt, Tim Mattox |
| Next by Thread: | Problem with recvmsg() and IPV6_PKTINFO, Stig Venaas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |