netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4189] New: IPv6 link local addresses are not assign

To: rick.jones2@xxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4189] New: IPv6 link local addresses are not assigned correctly on multiple-bonding enviromrnts
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:17:48 +0900 (JST)
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ikebe.takashi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, ctindel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fubar@xxxxxxxxxx, bonding-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <420C0D05.6020408@xxxxxx>
Organization: USAGI Project
References: <20050210122523.41276d5a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050211.092916.50162307.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420C0D05.6020408@xxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
In article <420C0D05.6020408@xxxxxx> (at Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:40:21 -0800), Rick 
Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> says:

> At present, for IPv4 if someone changes the MAC address of an interface, 
> existing TCP connections don't really care right?  The ARP caches will be 
> updated with a new IPv4 to MAC translation and happiness and joy ensues.
> 
> So, what would happen to TCP connections over IPv6 using link-local 
> addresses? 
> If the old address is taken away (deprecated), and a new address generated, 
> doesn't that mean that TCP connections (using link-local addresses anyway) 
> will 
> fail on a MAC change?

One thing: we won't delete it but deprecate it.

--yoshfuji

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>