netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv4 routing: multipath with cache support, 2.6.10-rc3

To: Einar Lück <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv4 routing: multipath with cache support, 2.6.10-rc3
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 13:17:10 -0800
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <420A75BF.1080106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <41C6B54F.2020604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050202172333.4d0ad5f0.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420A1011.1030602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050209120157.18dc75c1.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420A715D.7050106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050209123004.2d65e1cf.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <420A75BF.1080106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 21:42:39 +0100
Einar Lück <lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We considered the routing case: in the routing case ip_route_input is called. 
> In this case we just select the first route in the cache which is always the 
> same 
> (we ensure that). Consequently, the routing behaviour is not changed in this 
> case and 
> remains in the way you like it. 

Indeed.  You're right.  Let me re-review your second patch with
this new understanding in mind :-)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>