| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [IPSEC] Move dst->child loop from dst_ifdown to xfrm_dst_ifdown |
| From: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:29:29 +1100 |
| Cc: | mirko.parthey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050206065117.GC16057@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050131162201.GA1000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050205052407.GA17266@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050204213813.4bd642ad.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050205061110.GA18275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050204221344.247548cb.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050205064643.GA29758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050205201044.1b95f4e8.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050206065117.GC16057@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i |
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 05:51:17PM +1100, herbert wrote: > > The idea is to move the check into dst->ops->ifdown. By definition > ipv6_dst_ifdown will only see rt6_info entries. So dst_dev_event > will become Here are the patches to do this. Do they look sane? This one moves the dst->child processing from dst_ifdown into xfrm_dst_ifdown. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
|
| Previous by Date: | Linux Kernel Routing APIs, Megh Bhatt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPSEC] Move dst->child loop from dst_ifdown to xfrm_dst_ifdown, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PROBLEM: 2.6.11-rc2 hangs on bridge shutdown (br0), Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [IPSEC] Move dst->child loop from dst_ifdown to xfrm_dst_ifdown, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |