And both evolution and pine screw up the patches inline and break the
line at odd places... at least, that's what I see... you don't mind if
you have to do a little surgery here and there?
Dan
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 20:33 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > Make the Atmel wireless driver use SET_NETDEV_DEV to get the correct
> > entries in sysfs. Seems like somebody meant to do this but it got lost.
> > atmel_cs.c was previously fixed to pass in the correct struct device *
> > via handle_to_dev() but the driver never actually used it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/atmel.c 2005-01-27 20:26:46.000000000 -0500
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/atmel.c 2005-02-01 16:15:55.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -1579,6 +1579,8 @@
> > dev->irq = irq;
> > dev->base_addr = port;
> >
> > + SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, sys_dev);
> > +
> > if ((rc = request_irq(dev->irq, service_interrupt, SA_SHIRQ, dev->name,
> > dev))) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: register interrupt %d failed, rc %d\n",
> > dev->name, irq, rc );
> > goto err_out_free;
> >
> >
>
> Can you please resend all your patches with _just_ the patch inline,
> rather than both inline and attached?
>
> Your emails break my scripts, since the scripts try to apply both.
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
|