El lun, 31-01-2005 a las 17:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk escribió:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 04:15:43AM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:47:45 +0100, Arjan van de Ven said:
> > > as for obsd_get_random_long().. would it be possible to use the
> > > get_random_int() function from the patches I posted the other day? They
> > > use the existing random.c infrastructure instead of making a copy...
> > >
> > > I still don't understand why you need a obsd_rand.c and can't use the
> > > normal random.c
> > Note that obsd_rand.c started off life as a BSD-licensed file - I was told
> > that was a show-stopper when I submitted basically the same patch a while
> > back.
> At least the three clause BSD license is GPL compatible.
Yes, AFAIK :)
I will try to follow Arjan's recommendations on using his functions
instead of obsd ones, even if I think it should be alone in the current
Also I will split up the patch.
I will do it as soon as I get time for it, I need first to work out a
cleaner vsec (no more code in headers and such) and also a sys_chroot()
hook that I requested yesterday on the bugzilla, among the SELinux 2.4
backport which needs several fixes due to last 2.6 bk-commits reports.
Thanks for the comments,
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro <lorenzo@xxxxxxx>
[1024D/6F2B2DEC] & [2048g/9AE91A22][http://tuxedo-es.org]
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente