On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 09:06, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > Yeah, that would fix it. Note however, that i am trying to highly
> > discourage use of iptables and i would rather let people who use
> > iptables to suffer;-> (sounds rude i know). At some point i plan to
> > remove the dependency on iptables altogether.
> Heh, I think it isn't rude, giving people a little clap to join
> the "good side" isn't that bad ;->
Unfortunately killing it totaly would break all sorts of scripts.
Wish we could do this though ;->
Go ahead and push the patch to Dave even - I am just gonna look the
> > So i am not sure whether i should encourage pushing of this patch or not ;->
> I don't care that much, the patch is there, everyone can patch and
> distributions can pick it up. I agree that we should remove the
> dependency on iptables but I'd also like to see the dependency on the
> action bits to go away at the same time.
The main reason not to use the iptables bits is performance; also its
just the wrong spot in the stack.