Re: dummy as IMQ replacement

[jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 03:20, Hasso Tepper wrote:
> Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > 2) Allows for queueing incoming traffic for shaping instead of
> > dropping. I am not aware of any study that shows policing is
> > worse than shaping in achieving the end goal of rate control.
> > I would be interested if anyone is experimenting. Nevertheless,
> > this is still an alternative as opposed to making a system wide
> > ingress change.
> 
> Policing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked.

Really? I take it this is using the u32 classifier?
What filter did you use?

cheers,
jamal