[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

To: kaber@xxxxxxxxx (Patrick McHardy)
Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:11:32 +1100
Cc: rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxx, alexn@xxxxxxxxx, kas@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <41FD2043.3070303@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Core
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.27-hx-1-686-smp (i686))
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, final decision: you are right :) conntrack also defragments locally
> generated packets before they hit ip_fragment. In this case the fragments
> have skb->dst set.

Well caught.  The same thing is needed for IPv6, right?
Visit Openswan at
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page:
PGP Key:

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>