| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netdev-2.6 queue updated |
| From: | Andy Isaacson <adi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:15:30 -0800 |
| Cc: | Netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, Jouni Malinen <jkmaline@xxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <41F980A0.8020905@xxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <41F980A0.8020905@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 07:00:32PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The attached changelog describes what I just pushed out to BitKeeper
> (and what should be appearing in the next -mm release from Andrew).
>
> Note to BK users: please re-clone netdev-2.6, don't just 'bk pull'.
It's much more efficient to do
% bk undo -a`bk repogca`
(which deletes everything in the local repo that's not in the parent)
rather than pulling the entire repo over the wire again. [1]
You can check what would be deleted by this command with "bk changes -L"
similar to how you can "bk changes -R" to figure out what would be
pulled.
[1] Well, actually, it isn't *quite* that simple; in certain cases,
repogca will delete more than it needs to. But it's still more
efficient than a re-pull.
-andy
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: design for TSO performance fix, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Adding an IW_QUAL_ALL_UPDATED macro, Dan Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | netdev-2.6 queue updated, Jeff Garzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: netdev-2.6 queue updated, Jeff Garzik |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |