| To: | Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:47:32 -0800 |
| Cc: | torvalds@xxxxxxxx, alexn@xxxxxxxxx, kas@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050127082809.A20510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050121161959.GO3922@xxxxxxxxxx> <1106360639.15804.1.camel@boxen> <20050123091154.GC16648@xxxxxxx> <20050123011918.295db8e8.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050123095608.GD16648@xxxxxxx> <20050123023248.263daca9.akpm@xxxxxxxx> <20050123200315.A25351@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124114853.A16971@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125193207.B30094@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050127082809.A20510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This mornings magic numbers are: > > 3 > ip_dst_cache 1292 1485 256 15 1 I just did a q-n-d test here: send one UDP frame to 1.1.1.1 up to 1.1.255.255. The ip_dst_cache grew to ~15k entries and grew no further. It's now gradually shrinking. So there doesn't appear to be a trivial bug.. > Is no one interested in the fact that the DST cache is leaking and > eventually takes out machines? I've had virtually zero interest in > this problem so far. I guess we should find a way to make it happen faster. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Russell King |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | 2.6.11-rc2 TCP ignores PMTU ICMP (Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc2), Janos Farkas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Russell King |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?, Alessandro Suardi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |