| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [XFRM] Probe selected algorithm only |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:22:18 -0800 |
| Cc: | jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050121224546.GA8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050121101938.GA1133@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xine.LNX.4.44.0501210901001.6594-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050121224546.GA8654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:45:46 +1100 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Since we know the type of algorithm required when we're adding a new > > > SA, we can get away with only probing the selected algorithms. This > > > is what the following patch does for xfrm_user. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Looks good to me. > > > > Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sorry, I forgot to update the calls in af_key. Here is the corrected > version. Applied, thanks Herbert. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPSEC] Stop using dst->xfrm, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IPSEC] Stop using dst->xfrm, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [XFRM] Probe selected algorithm only, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | [IPSEC] Stop using dst->xfrm, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |