|To:||Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|From:||Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Tue, 25 Jan 2005 03:01:18 +0100|
|Cc:||"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx|
|References:||<20050123202715.281ac87c.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124121610.GP23931@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41F50B6C.6010107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124151510.GV23931@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124225423.GA15405@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124234515.GA31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125000759.GA15883@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124164049.3b939791.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125014538.GB31837@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050125014838.GA16637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
* Herbert Xu <20050125014838.GA16637@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2005-01-25 12:48 > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 02:45:38AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > > > > Still, one problem remains, even if ip_summed was incorrect, > > skb_checksum_help should never be called in dev_queue_xmit for the > > acenic driver since it sets NETIF_F_IP_CSUM. For some reason, features > > is set to 0 while checking for it. > > Didn't he say that he cleared the features bits in the acenic driver? He changed it back to the original version, I just checked with him. > BTW, is he using acenic for both the LAN and the WAN? If he's only > using it on the WAN side, then the LAN side might not be CSUM capable. The packets get routed back over the same physical interface.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|