netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: skb_checksum_help

from [David Coulson] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: skb_checksum_help
From: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:51:24 -0500
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kaber@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050124121610.GP23931@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20050124005348.GL23931@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1Cst4o-0007bD-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050123202715.281ac87c.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050124121610.GP23931@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 


Thomas Graf wrote:

Yes, this might clear things up.
10.1.1.5 is a production NS, so there is >500kbit/sec of DNS traffic to the box. Do you want me to restrict tcpdump to the /24 we were seeing traffic from which broke the kernel, or dump everything and send the part from around when the kernel fails? 


David, can you do this? and fix my patch by changing

        if (skb->h.raw < skb->data || skb->h.raw > skb->data)
into:
        if (skb->h.raw < skb->data || skb->h.raw > skb->tail)


Done

David

--
David J. Coulson
email: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
web: http://www.davidcoulson.net/
phone: (216) 920-3100 / (216) 258-4942
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: skb_checksum_help, David Coulson
Next by Date:  Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1, Benoit Boissinot
Previous by Thread:  Re: skb_checksum_help, Thomas Graf
Next by Thread:  Re: skb_checksum_help, Thomas Graf
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]