On Friday 21 January 2005 09:23 am, Robert Olsson wrote:
> We have to understand the GC details to 100% confident. Some time to digest
> and a may reboot help.
> I also mentioned routing without the route hash. No spinning in route
> hash and no GC but we trade this for doing a fib lookup for every packet.
> Jamal and I started to play with this at last OLS but it's only tested
> in lab sofar.
I'd like to hold off on that right now. Things are running pretty good right
now. I'm trying to get my hands on a 'test' system to run side-by-side with
the production system. We go live Feb 1 with our app so I need to start
toning down some of the down time.
> For environments with small number of flows it's probably not a good idea
> Length of flows is of course also important. No idea about the result in
> your case.
>
> I have a patch:
>
> ftp:/robur.slu.se:/pub/Linux/net-development/preroute/preroute10.pat
>
> If you feel very brave you can test this. The files to monitor is
> /proc/net/softnet_stat this verify the new packet path.
>
> With rtstat (tot) should show all routed packets. The rate in pps
> we are able to achieve.
I actually think I could have our other test system ready early next week.
I'll let you know.
Have a good weekend.
--
--------------------------------------------------
Jeremy M. Guthrie jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx
Senior Network Engineer Phone: 608-298-1061
Berbee Fax: 608-288-3007
5520 Research Park Drive NOC: 608-298-1102
Madison, WI 53711
|