| To: | Frank Pavlic <PAVLIC@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] ipv6: alternative version of S/390 shared NIC support |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 19 Jan 2005 23:47:30 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christian Bornträger <christian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, waldi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <OF0E859D23.C429AEE7-ON41256F8E.006F7D15-41256F8E.00765607@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <OF0E859D23.C429AEE7-ON41256F8E.006F7D15-41256F8E.00765607@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 16:32, Frank Pavlic wrote: > Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Best regards > Frank Pavlic Ok, thanks to both you and Christian for the explanations. I think i understand better now. So essentially the hypervisor assumes the OSInstance speaks L3 (but not exactly L2);-> Yep, that would be a little challenging .. I have other suggestions on resolving some of this but i sympathize with the process you have to go through so i wont burden you with it;-> I think the patch that was in is good nuf a solution. BTW, How did this work out in other OSes you mentioned? For something as expensive as these beasts i have heard are, I have to say i am a little suprised by this "deficiency". cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: More tc action mess, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: was Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] ipv6: alternative version of S/390 shared NIC support, Frank Pavlic |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] ipv6: alternative version of S/390 shared NIC support, David S. Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |