netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6

To: jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6
From: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:18:15 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200501190903.45671.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501071416060.5818-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501141326.29575.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> <16874.24305.461492.48668@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501190903.45671.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Jeremy M. Guthrie writes:

 > >  gc_elasticity, gc_interval, gc_thresh etc I would avoid gc_min_interval.

 > I have done a little tweaking. I now hold at around 520K routes in the hash. 
 >  
 > I still drop packets every secret_interval but I've upped that counter so I 
 > don't whack all of my hash entries all that often.


 Sounds you done progress. 
 This with relative conservative setting if RX-buffers?

 secret_interval needs special care as it flushes the cache totally.

 What did you tweak? 
 Your output from rtstat will be very interesting.


                                         --ro

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>