| To: | jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6 |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:18:15 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200501190903.45671.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501071416060.5818-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501141326.29575.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> <16874.24305.461492.48668@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501190903.45671.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Jeremy M. Guthrie writes:
> > gc_elasticity, gc_interval, gc_thresh etc I would avoid gc_min_interval.
> I have done a little tweaking. I now hold at around 520K routes in the hash.
>
> I still drop packets every secret_interval but I've upped that counter so I
> don't whack all of my hash entries all that often.
Sounds you done progress.
This with relative conservative setting if RX-buffers?
secret_interval needs special care as it flushes the cache totally.
What did you tweak?
Your output from rtstat will be very interesting.
--ro
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] ipv6: alternative version of S/390 shared NIC support, Frank Pavlic |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] make ipx use a slab cache for its socks, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |