| To: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [BK PATCH] sk_dst_cache annotation |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:59:29 -0800 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050118.114034.89476074.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050115.160008.04476889.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050117124913.49c253b6.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050118.114034.89476074.yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:40:34 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Let me clarify: > if all the code paths (for each socket type) lock socket, > we don't need sk_dst_lock at all (for that socket type). > otherwise, we have races; we need sk_dst_lock (for that socket type). > > Am I corrent? That's correct. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [IPV6] merge raw6_opt with raw6_sock, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: An interface goes away while a socket is bound to it..what happens?, Ben Greear |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [BK PATCH] sk_dst_cache annotation, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] [IPV6] Don't use obsolete entries., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |