| To: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput |
| From: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | 18 Jan 2005 09:43:51 -0500 |
| Cc: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Werner Almesberger <werner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20050118143658.GA11474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | jamalopolous |
| References: | <20050117152312.GC26856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1105976711.1078.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050117160539.GD26856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1105979807.1078.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050117165626.GE26856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106002197.1046.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050118134406.GR26856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1106058592.1035.95.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050118143658.GA11474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 09:36, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:29:52AM -0500, jamal wrote: > If you do this, please consider using Juniper config syntax instead > of doing it the Cisco/quagga way. > Juniper is XML driven config files? [I am hoping Thomas would do it, btw;-> only if we strongly disagree then i will be tempted to provide an alternative]. btw, libio uses libevent; i recall you said you had some alternative to it. cheers, jamal |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, Lennert Buytenhek |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] batched tc to improve change throughput, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |