| To: | "'Lennert Buytenhek'" <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'jamal'" <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-i n-IPv4 tunneling) |
| From: | "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Jan 2005 07:54:01 -0500 |
| Cc: | "'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Pekka Savola'" <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'shemminger@xxxxxxxx'" <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, "'Russ Housley'" <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > BTW, in one of your emails i > > noticed you cced the authors of that RFC - did they > respond? Whats their > > deployment experiences? > > The @rsa.. address bounces, the other address is still in the CC list > and I didn't hear from him yet :-) The correct current address for Russ is housley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx I've cc'd him here. So what do you want to hear? As the RFC says, etherIP documents work that Russ and I did at Xerox during the early 1990s. It was developed and deployed for use in conjunction with the Xerox Encryption Unit (XEU), a layer 2 (Ethernet/802.3) network encryption device. As the XEU was never a big seller etherIP never really got "out there", either, but it certainly worked in the environment for which it was intended. -Scott- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: iproute2 fwmark feature request, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] [IPV6]: Ensure to learn link-layer address from RA., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Previous by Thread: | [2.6 patch] unexport xfrm_policy_delete, Adrian Bunk |
| Next by Thread: | RE: tunneling in linux (was: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-i n-IPv4 tunneling), Russ Housley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |