Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures

[Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 12:37:29PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:45:47 +1100
> Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > +         if (sk->sk_forward_alloc < copy &&
> > > +             !sk_stream_mem_schedule(sk, copy, 0))
> > 
> > You want to have sk->sk_allocation here instead of 0.
> 
> The third argument to sk_stream_mem_schedule() is "int kind"
> which is to be set to 1 for receive packet allocations and 0
> for send packet allocations.
> 
> Why would I want to use a sk_allocation gfp mask here? :-)

You're right.  I got carried away there :)
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt