On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 13:29, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> >Heres one i think you didnt resurect Patrick. If ok, Dave please apply.
> >Other than that i cant seem to find anything at issue with the core
> >(havent looked at the individual actions other than to follow changed
> >code from the core).
> bindcnt/refcnt changes are protected by the rtnl, no need for extra locking.
> The lock only needs to protect data shared with the "act" function.
Very clever ;-> maybe add a comment then to that effect in your next
batch? Dave ignore that patch.