[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling

To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] etherip: Ethernet-in-IPv4 tunneling
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 16 Jan 2005 12:37:00 -0500
Cc: Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx, shollenbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050113092351.GA23170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <20050112222437.GC14280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501130944270.19573@xxxxxxxxxx> <20050113092351.GA23170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 04:23, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 09:49:55AM +0200, Pekka Savola wrote:
> > Is there a particular reason why GRE tunnel is not sufficient? 
> No particular reason, apart from not being aware that GRE provides
> this functionality.

True that GRE can do all this (and they have thought out well the
broadcasting etc) but i dont think it will harm to push this into the
kernel if some odd OS like openbsd supports it. 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>