| To: | Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures |
| From: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:36:11 -0800 |
| Cc: | anton@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050114213829.GA12454@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20050113171234.3fde0925.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114012504.GF6309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050113201914.46b7c4a2.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114111648.GA27964@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114120322.GA28449@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114110352.23c94ab9.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114203452.GA1277@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114132757.4ca3153a.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050114213829.GA12454@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:38:29 +1100 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 01:27:57PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > > You missed the whole problem. > > > > It has nothing to do with the MSS changing. > > However if the MSS does change then it can cause the same symptoms. > In fact the MSS can easily increase when TSO is enabled since it > increases as the RCV window is opened up. MSS changes are handled _transparently_ if we do the adjustments as we actaully add data to the packet. We always account what is actually put into the packet in this way. That's why I made the fix the way that I did. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] merge udp_opt with udp_sock, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, Herbert Xu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures, Herbert Xu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |