[Top] [All Lists]

Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6
From: "Jeremy M. Guthrie" <jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:05:10 -0600
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>, Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200501121445.51780.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Berbee Information Networks
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501071416060.5818-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <16869.34519.31321.977100@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501121445.51780.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7.2
I am now getting some push back from the project manager on this performance 
problem.  I am wondering if you think faster CPUs will 
a)  help relieve the symptoms of this problem
b)  not help because now we will hit a '# of routes in the route-cache' 
c)  or will help to a point till the # interrupts come back and bite us.


Jeremy M. Guthrie        jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx
Senior Network Engineer        Phone: 608-298-1061
Berbee                           Fax: 608-288-3007
5520 Research Park Drive         NOC: 608-298-1102
Madison, WI 53711

Attachment: pgpt3C95sCas1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>