| To: | jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6 |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:36:06 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200501061520.02362.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200501031455.26980.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> <200501061335.55104.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> <16861.40858.80960.794144@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501061520.02362.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Jeremy M. Guthrie writes:
> Pulling Rx Polling has kept V2.6 from dropping packets. argh?!?!?!
Thats fine...
> I should have caught that sooner. 8( Well, I have a window of opportunity
> here. If you want I can still provide a broken environment but that seems
> pointless while NAPI is not acting right... what is evident is that this
> will run better till we start to bump up against the top of CPU0.
I don't follow...
The stats didn't show any numbers so we don't know your load.
--ro
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |