[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver.

To: Tommy Christensen <tommy.christensen@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/10] s390: network driver.
From: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06 Jan 2005 08:58:32 -0500
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Spatzier <thomas.spatzier@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Paul Jakma <paul@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <41DC0931.80603@xxxxxxxxx>
Organization: jamalopolous
References: <OFB7F7E23F.EFB88418-ONC1256F7E.0031769E-C1256F7E.003270AD@xxxxxxxxxx> <1104764710.1048.580.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41DB26A6.2070008@xxxxxxxxx> <1104895169.1117.63.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41DC0931.80603@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 2005-01-05 at 10:35, Tommy Christensen wrote:
> jamal wrote:

> Except for the drivers that call netif_stop_queue() on link-down. These
> calls (and the corresponding netif_wake_queue) would have to be removed.

If we assume all drivers do:
netif_stop then carrier_off then you dont need that extra check.
Thats the working assumption i had - maybe a comment is deserving or
we could say we dont think that all drivers are going to follow that 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>