| To: | "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steve Hill" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [Prism54-devel] Re: [Prism54-users] Open hardware wireless cards |
| From: | "Andriy Korud" <a.korud@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:34:02 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Netdev" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jean Tourrilhes" <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <prism54-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <prism54-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcTzZlCkwLK6ZQ9pT36HT8ksJlpIgwADzxad |
| Thread-topic: | [Prism54-devel] Re: [Prism54-users] Open hardware wireless cards |
> AFAICT the FullMAC chipsets have reached the END OF LIFE period. Sorry, as I know (no more details - NDA, sorry) some manufacturers are developing (and planning to continue) FullMAC 802.11g (and further) chipsets and also they are offering Linux drivers (however had no chance to test yet). But from my point of view, SoftMAC cards are better sometimes - you have more control from drivers and can implement some interesting features (for example, madwifi Linux driver with MAC layer ported from xBSD). Any thoughts why we should prefer FullMAC cards over SoftMAC (except CPU usage, of course)? regards, -- Andriy Korud |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFC] tulip VLAN support, Johannes Erdfelt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFC] tulip VLAN support, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 3992] New: Bondig. Not correct work function ARP Monitoring. Broken link., Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Prism54-devel] Re: [Prism54-users] Open hardware wireless cards, Jean-Baptiste Note |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |