netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Prism54-devel] Re: [Prism54-users] Open hardware wireless cards

To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steve Hill" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Prism54-devel] Re: [Prism54-users] Open hardware wireless cards
From: "Andriy Korud" <a.korud@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 23:34:02 +0100
Cc: "Netdev" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jean Tourrilhes" <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <prism54-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <prism54-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcTzZlCkwLK6ZQ9pT36HT8ksJlpIgwADzxad
Thread-topic: [Prism54-devel] Re: [Prism54-users] Open hardware wireless cards
> AFAICT the FullMAC chipsets have reached the END OF LIFE period.

Sorry, as I know (no more details - NDA, sorry) some manufacturers are 
developing (and planning to continue) FullMAC 802.11g (and further) chipsets 
and also they are offering Linux drivers (however had no chance to test yet).

But from my point of view, SoftMAC cards are better sometimes - you have more 
control from drivers and can implement some interesting features (for example, 
madwifi Linux driver with MAC layer ported from xBSD). 

Any thoughts why we should prefer FullMAC cards over SoftMAC (except CPU usage, 
of course)?

regards,

--

Andriy Korud 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>