| To: | jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6 |
| From: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:22:55 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <200501051325.40616.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <200501031455.26980.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> <16860.5674.612383.986202@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200501051135.03493.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> <200501051325.40616.jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Jeremy M. Guthrie writes:
> After smp_affinity adjustments and turning off IRQ balancing.
>
> eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:02:B3:D5:7E:30
> RX packets:537271635 errors:2377048 dropped:2377048
> overruns:1849169
Worse?
Yes. I'll remember Hararld moved rt_cache_stat /proc/net/stats/ and wrote a
new utility for it. Should be in iproute2 package. Stephen knows the
details. Otherwise change path in rtstat. You need this to relate and
verify the load.
Check throughtput and how packet load is used with 2.4. /proc/net/softnet_stat
and rtstat. Also meditate how the comparison can be fair wrt taffic patterns.
Do smame with 2.6.
Prepare for a oprofile. I'm lazy and compile the stuff I use into kernel if
you can get the same result w. nodules it's ok.
--ro
|
| Previous by Date: | Network driver test suite?, David Hollis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Prism54-users] Open hardware wireless cards, Steve Hill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: V2.4 policy router operates faster/better than V2.6, Jeremy M. Guthrie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |