[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue

To: Eric Lemoine <eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: LLTX and netif_stop_queue
From: Grant Grundler <iod00d@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:12:27 -0800
Cc: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, hadi@xxxxxxxxxx, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, openib-general@xxxxxxxxxx, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5cac192f0501030907c755135@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <5cac192f0412230110628749e3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41CAF444.3000305@xxxxxxxxx> <5cac192f04122408102129af43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1104240717.1100.66.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5cac192f0501021530672a908a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1104764660.1048.578.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <52brc68q05.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5cac192f05010308414a25b548@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <527jmu8nbw.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxx> <5cac192f0501030907c755135@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:07:00PM +0100, Eric Lemoine wrote:
> If I understand correctly, LLTX aims at avoiding cache misses on lock
> variables (because of cacheline bouncing). So the effect of LLTX
> should increase as the number of CPUs not sharing the same cache
> increases. And two CPUs might not be enough...

Cacheline bouncing usually starts to show up with > 4 CPUs (ie 8 or more).
Some workloads that Jamal cares about (routing) only need 2 cpus.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>