netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Patch: add loglevel to printk's in net/ipv4/route.c

To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Patch: add loglevel to printk's in net/ipv4/route.c
From: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 03:46:04 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@xxxxxx>, Networking Team <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-net <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <41D2152F.8080501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412290256000.3528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41D2104D.3010406@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0412290312540.3528@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41D2120E.8030008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20041229021256.GD29323@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <41D2152F.8080501@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

> 
> 
> Jörn Engel wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 December 2004 00:10:22 -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > 
> > > > It doesn't make much difference, it's mostly for
> > > > completeness/correctness.
> > > 
> > > No, it does a helluva difference, give it a try :-)
> > 
> > 
> > hint: look for "\n"
> 
> hint2: Or the _lack_ of "\n" 8)
> 

Ok, obviously something's wrong, but it's currently 03:44 here, so I'll 
take a look at it tomorrow (or quite possibly the day after since I have 
things to do).
Thank you for commenting, I'll dig into it at the first oppotunity I have.


-- 
Jesper




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>