Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark should ignore ECN bits

netdev

Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark should ignore ECN bits

To:	Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark should ignore ECN bits
From:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:54:21 -0800
Cc:	netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20041227193822.GK7884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References:	<20041227193822.GK7884@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 20:38:22 +0100
Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Taking ECN bits into account doesn't make sense. The two bits were
> still unused at the time the code was written so this brings back the
> old behaviour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>

Looks good, I put this into my 2.4 tree as well.

Thanks.

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark should ignore ECN bits, Thomas Graf Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark should ignore ECN bits, David S. Miller <=

Previous by Date:	[PATCH][v5][23/24] Add InfiniBand Documentation files, Roland Dreier
Next by Date:	Re: [PATCH][INET] move inet_sock into inet_opt and rename it to inet_sock, David S. Miller
Previous by Thread:	[PATCH] PKT_SCHED: dsmark should ignore ECN bits, Thomas Graf
Next by Thread:	[RFT] r8169 changes in 2.6.x, Francois Romieu
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]